BBC Newsnight: UK Bans Exports of "Bomb Detecting" Dowsing Rods

33comtois Says:

Jul 6, 2010 - @EmpiricalAlpha yeah... keep bringing useful evidence like this. moron.

33comtois Says:

Jul 6, 2010 - @MortalTodd somebody, please, send this guy back to the Middle Ages

MortalTodd Says:

Jul 6, 2010 - @33comtois Where they use dowsing rods? Typically, I'm all for rehabilitation, but this guy has caused so much death and scammed so many people that he's better off rotting. And if you don't agree with me, that's fine, I don't expect many people too do so. And perhaps it is just because I'm mad about this.

EmpiricalAlpha Says:

Jul 6, 2010 - @33comtois Well lets see, you aint brought jack shit. 1 is still greater than 0. Your making an argument from ignorance.

cristeadriana10 Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @MortalTodd How did let you free on the streets? Do you have internet at the institute? Any way this is one more argument regarding the quality of supporters of McCormick guiltiness. All of them have mental disease or childhood scaffold.

33comtois Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @EmpiricalAlpha you are free to read the arguments posted below by yours truly. you, on the other hand, didn't bring anything useful here, except the level of the conversation to the lowest limits. you've read somewhere else the line about the magic beans and laughed your ass off. then came here and said it as you own deep thinking when, in reality, figuring out that 1 is greater than 0 was the summit of your intellectual capabilities.

33comtois Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @MortalTodd i love it when i see people believe with such passion in things other have said to them and failed to prove or even make the direct connections, leaving their believers to make their own connections, making them feel they fully understand the big picture, otherwise how could they draw such obvious conclusions!? right!? well it gives me hope that someday i could persuade a bunch of people, like you and many others, that it was their idea to donate all their money to me :)

MortalTodd Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @33comtois I honestly have no idea what you're going on about.

MortalTodd Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @cristeadriana10 The fuck are you and 33comtois rambling on about? I don't even understand what it is that either of you are trying to get across to me. Use clear English next time, it helps.

EmpiricalAlpha Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @33comtois Oh course I read the line about magic beans. Its from Jack and Bean stalk! A fairytale.

EmpiricalAlpha Says:

Jul 7, 2010 - @33comtois Well I just went through all 21 of your comments, above and below. You have not presented ANY evidence. You have presented as an argument: 1)The journalist opened a device not constant with how it looks. This has nothing to do with the court case. UK courts and law enforcement do not charge people based on the media. 2)Your uncle told you. Seriously? Seriously that's your evidence? If you have something else...bring it. Or point to it.

cristeadriana10 Says:

Jul 12, 2010 - @EmpiricalAlpha There are many arguments that prove this device can and work fine in explosives detecting. Just search over the internet Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance and you will find the answers. The device is using the top of technology in bomb detection; its name is Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance. NQR is a radio frequency (RF) technique that can be used to interrogate and detect specific chemical compounds, including explosives.

33comtois Says:

Jul 13, 2010 - @EmpiricalAlpha all it was all about was arguments. so the conclusion is i have some and you have none. thank you.

vOddy75 Says:

Jul 20, 2010 - Eight people missed the "Like" button. Fuck these scammers who profit on the middle eastern people's suffering.

ernstfilibert Says:

Jul 20, 2010 - @vOddy75 Yeah right 8 people from 126895 viewers it is a big important percentage, around 0.006%. Get real man!

atethics Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @vOddy75 It is a known fact that ADE saves lives not scams people. You can read all over the internet about the NQR detecting bomb technology. All over the world scientific laboratories confirmed the power of this technology and his capabilities in saving lives.

ChrisBowlas Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @atethics No - Sandia Labs tested it, found it did not work and looked inside. They found that the box was empty. When BBC Newsnight examined the 'programmed cards', they found only a square spiral of aluminium foil like that in an anti-theft tag which was incapable of being programmed in any way. The only mode in which this contraption 'works' is to enrich the crooks selling it to the gullible.

ChrisBowlas Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @cristeadriana10 So you've decided it works by means of NQR, have you? You've decided that despite the fact that the device contains neither a transmitter nor a receiving coil, and despite the range claimed by Jim McCormick - up to a kilometre away - is far greater than the few centimetres range of a genuine NQR device? Perhaps you should tell Mr McCormick of your findings, as he was until recently telling people it 'worked' by "electrostatic magnetic ion attraction" - which is bullshit.

ChrisBowlas Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @MortalTodd cristeadriana10 posts from Romania, so English is not his/her first language; despite the silly insults which cristeadriana10 likes to post to/about anyone who dares to point out that the ADE 651 is a scam, he/she does remarkably well in English. Perhaps, if we were to use Google translate to turn our comments into (a version of) Romanian, he/she might be a little less hard of understanding?

atethics Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @ChrisBowlas Show me the report from Sandia Labs. I want to see written by them black on white that the device is not working. By the way how much is a sniff dog costs and how many crooks have they got rich, are you one of them? I guess you are, other way you had no reason to be so virulent against ADE without real proves.

ChrisBowlas Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @ Cristeadriana10 Aşadar, aţi decis că funcţionează prin intermediul NQR, în ciuda faptului că dispozitivul nu conţine bobina receptoare, şi în ciuda gamei susţinut de Jim McCormick - până la un kilometru distanţă - este mult mai mare decât câţiva centimetri gama unei veritabile NQR dispozitiv? Poate tu ar trebui să-i spuneţi domnului McCormick şi descoperirile dumneavoastră, ca el a spus oamenilor că "a lucrat" de "atracţie electrostatică Ion magnetice" - care e un rahat.

ChrisBowlas Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - I believe that Mr McCormick should be charged with numerous counts of fraud and also, invoking the Accessories and Abettors Act (1861), with being an abettor of several, specimen counts of manslaughter related to instances when the ADE 651 failed to detect a terrorist bomb in Iraq. Once the vendors of these fake 'detectors' realise they will be held responsible for the results of their scam, they may try something else such as selling 'lucky charms'.

cristeadriana10 Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @ChrisBowlas Your accusation are not founded, you are aberrant and try to manipulate people with your lies. Maybe Mr. McCormick layers will find a way to sue you for his public defamation without having any proves. I think crocks like you should pay for their facts.

33comtois Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @ChrisBowlas 1.sandia tested ANOTHER device 2. sidney alford opened ANOTHER device 3. dr. markus kuhn claims that no information whatsoever could be contained on those cards since they have no microchips or electronics. well then, there are simple access cards, with magnetic tape inside, that carry a lot of information. if that coil he shows us contains or could contain, once placed in an electromagnetic field, a single bit of information, then the good dr. is wrong.

MortalTodd Says:

Jul 21, 2010 - @ChrisBowlas Point noted. I don't even remember my comment, really. And I'm not scrolling to find it.